Political election news leads off tonight. A few surprises tonight, a big one was the loss by New Jersey governor Jon Corzine, who is at this point losing by over 100,000 votes with 99% of the precincts. This man a few weeks ago had a fair lead, and as late as last week Jon Corzine had a 5% lead on Chris Christie. Mister Christie however rode a wave of anti-Government sentiment to a win in the New Jersey race this evening. I find it interesting that Independent Chris Daggett seems to have pulled enough votes from Corzine to make a real difference in this election. Jon Corzine has lost by 106,000 votes, and Mister Daggett got a total of 132,000 votes. Now there is no guarantee that ALL those votes would have gone to Jon Corzine, but most pollsters seem convinced that he would pull votes from The Democratic Governor of New Jersey.
______________________________________________________________________________
Another surprise, to me at least, is the less than amazing poll numbers for conservative John Hoffman in NY23. with 76% of precincts reporting, the man who has been talked up by the right as being their guy is losing to democrat Bill Owens. I believe I need to remind everyone here that the last time a democrat won a congressional seat in this district, neither Oregon, Kansas nor Nebraska were yet states in the Union. Now, there are still some 11,000 absentee ballots to be counted, so this race is far from over, but this race is much MUCH tighter than anyone, I think was ready for. The final Siena poll in NY23 had Hoffman winning this race by 5 points with a 41%-36% advantage. There was a second poll out by PPP that saw a convincing win for the Hoffman camp on the Horizon. Goes to show you that sometimes polling can be really off.
_____________________________________________________________________________
But the biggest surprise tonight may have been in a losing cause. Bill Thompson ran a failed bid to unseat Mayor Mike Bloomberg, but was much closer than anyone had anticipated. Most polls out had King Mike pulling this victory out in runaway fashion, generally winning by between 12 and 15 points. Not exactly the way it happened. The win for Bloomberg was in doubt for much of the night, and only at the end of the night did he manage to put any distance between himself and Bill Thompson. Mike Bloomberg won by less than half the margin predicted in either of these contests, a 5.6% margin.
I guess $100,000,000 doesn’t go quite as far as it used to. This is far from a mandate for mayor Bloomberg, it is, if anything, a wake up call for the man. A lot of people were unhappy with the way he seemed to just take the system and change it to his advantage by overriding the will of the people, and he lost large swaths of votes as a result.
____________________________________________________________________________
News Flash! Bill Owens, Democrat in New York’s 23rd district has just been declared the winner in that race!
____________________________________________________________________________
There are a great many more stories from tonight, and a great many more sources to pull from than the few that I used here. I want now to turn my attention to something that has been said, and that I have heard about the election results nationwide, that this is a referendum on The President, or this administrations policies, or that these results are a referendum on the economy, or jobs, or whatever.
I am not certain that that is 100% true. There is a kernel of truth in it, but I think the truth of what this night means is not something quite as simple as all that. To try and place a larger nation context on smaller races is a bit of a joke, if anything the NY23 puts that lie to the run and shows that if anything, that particular vote was a referendum on not being pushed around by the media and big name politicians, trying to push their weight around. That race was a direct slap at all the right wing wing nuts who tried to make it about who was far enough right to run in their district.
This election was very much about more local issues than about any national agenda, even if those local issues were driven by larger concerns for the economy or political infighting. This election was less a referendum on Obama, and more a referendum on a weak candidate in Virginia, a self righteous man who tried to buy an election in New York and a too self assured candidate who represented big money in New Jersey… in other words, and like I said, more local and less national, more a personal focus and less big picture.
That’s my take anyway. And I didn’t even mention the ballot measures, either the ones in New York that I mentioned yesterday, which passed, I believe, that’s what it looked like on the NY1 website, or the other big ones in Maine or Washington. Go fig, prolly hit that tomorrow, if I’m not too busy.
That’s it from here. Later!
Today’s nuggets, via wikiquote: In short, we must face problems which do not lend themselves to easy or quick or permanent solutions. And we must face the fact that the United States is neither omnipotent nor omniscient, that we are only six percent of the world’s population, that we cannot impose our will upon the other ninety-four percent of mankind, that we cannot right every wrong or reverse each adversity, and that therefore there cannot be an American solution to every world problem. President John F. Kennedy
If a political party does not have its foundation in the determination to advance a cause that is right and that is moral, then it is not a political party; it is merely a conspiracy to seize power. President Dwight D. Eisenhower
game.
ral race, I will be voting for Bill Thompson. Bloomberg isn’t bad by any stretch of the imagination, but his term is up, his time is to have expired, and he is only here by virtue of him going out of his way to alter the city charter so he could grab a third term outside the consent of the voting public. I was not, am not and will never be a fan of term limits, but these term limits were the law, until King Mike decided it was time to change that. Yes the city council was also in on it, so they share a portion of the blame, but this election should not be about Mike Bloomberg, yet it is, because he decided the will of the people was wrong and got the city council to bend the rules especially for him.
te does not meet the far rights criterion will be pounded into submission, subverting the will of the local members of the party?
hypocrite for finding two trillion dollars to cut out of the budget, when he signed a bill that spends 787 billion dollars. Yeah, because jump starting the economy when the entire crux of the move is to JUMP START THE ECONOMY is somehow hypocritical. Yes i know he was going in a different direction then that, but It does not matter, The move was designed to help the economy, not Tom DeLay and his texas billionaire buddies. He still seems to think that cutting taxes to the point of starving the government so his friends can make money by the shovel full regardless of the effect on the economy is a good thing.
Wow. That seems very optimistic. If this is the stress test, it would, to my mind be a mess to use this, due to extreme and undue optimism of viewpoint not borne out by current trends. Most people’s projections up to this point have been badly off. No one, at the beginning of last year, thought we would be where we are now. No one thought the market would be near 7,000. Most projections I saw from that point saw a DJIA nearer to 11 or 12 thousand for end of 2008. No one thought unemployment would be over 7%. No one thought we would see a run on money market accounts to the tune of ½ trillion dollars in one day last September. 
